Archive: May, 2007

Microwave your daughter lately?

I have just read the latest “The devil made him do it” article. In this particular instance, a man put a two month old into a microwave and cooked her for about 10-20 seconds.

The mother (yes, the mother) is actually defending this piece of shit. For that, she will hopefully not be allowed to retain custody of her child. Obviously, the idiot that tried to fry her should be fried himself, but how can anyone seriously consider allowing this idiotic mother to have contact with her child?

She is defending the jackass that tried to kill her daughter. What kind of warped world do we live in?

He caused severe burns to the poor child and he faces only 5-99 years in prison. I hope he gets the full 99. I would prefer the death penalty, but it is unfortunately not an option in this case.

You have to love stolen content

Apparently some RSS aggregation site is publishing a complete reproduction of my blog content on their site. Unfortunately, Feedburner was set as a “attribution, noncommercial, share-alike” Creative Commons license, v 2.5. Even given this license, this site is definitely commercial and making money from ads on pages with my content.

I have since updated my license on Feedburner to a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, just like it is posted on the blog home page here (look in the right column and at the bottom of the page). This will allow anyone to post my work on a noncommercial site by attributing the work to me as long as it is published in whole.

It isn’t that I mind them publishing my work so much. Mostly I am upset that they didn’t ask permission (I would have given it), they didn’t pay any attention to the copyright, and they still haven’t responded to the email I sent about removing my content.

I’m small-fry. My readership amounts to next to nothing. I am just ticked that people don’t have the kindness to request permission to publish my content. Just a simple “Hey, can we publish your feed?” and I would have said yes in a heartbeat.

I’m all about the spreading of ideas and information freely, but respect the author’s wishes.

Twitter Updates for 2007-05-18

  • Bright sunny day. Amaya graduates today. She’s excited. #

Twitter Updates for 2007-05-17

  • Two calls today. Hardee’s for lunch. #

Renshaw reqests recount

Mount Vernon City Council candidate Kent Renshaw has requested a recount of some precincts from the April election. According to the certified results, Kent came in 10 votes shy of the candidate in front of him.

In the interest of disclosure, I have spoken to Kent several times and did support him in his bid for election.

With that out of the way, I agree with the recount. There are several reasons that I would have requested one under these circumstances:

  • Diebold machines have been shown to repeatedly be tampered with
  • Machines only function as well as their makers (people)
  • Votes may not have been tallied properly due to a power surge
  • 10 voters may need to be disqualified

I could go on and on, but you get the idea. With such a close race, the votes need to be examined more carefully to ensure correct results.

Several hundred or several thousand votes wouldn’t likely require a recount, but I think 10 votes do require one.