- RT @AdviceMallards: There is never a good war or a bad peace 18:44:34
- @shwood Great. Now I have to go learn how to do that. @BrettFM in reply to shwood 19:40:06
- @BrettFM I'd appreciate it. Have to put a new drive in my media server anyway. Just add that to the checklist. @shwood in reply to BrettFM 21:18:24
Archive: December, 2013
- Hey, kids! Look – a deer! – and so begins Saturday. 09:20:10
- @thehooch36 For safety. #ChristmasVacation in reply to thehooch36 22:49:02
- RT @acedtect: We're incredibly grateful to all the folks who backed CordKillers on @patreon http://t.co/I1tz2OmDLB Not required but much ap… 13:47:15
- RT @acedtect: What am I up to next? http://t.co/fvAUvmdvRD, http://t.co/V522BSdH8K and http://t.co/PZK6kKXFdz and always http://t.co/325qLy… 14:14:55
So, I don’t like Duck Dynasty. No big deal. That’s not the reason for me spouting off about this latest controversy. Duck Dynasty is about a family that got rich making a good product. Good for them. They are the poster-family for the hunting/redneck lifestyle. Again, good for them. I wish them nothing but the best in life.
Now, they are being made martyrs for a few comments made by the patriarch, Phil Robertson. Here is the specific quote in question from GQ:
Everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong. Sin becomes fine…Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men,”
Well, he has his opinion and that’s fine. He has a popular medium to disseminate that opinion which is good for him. He has every right to spout off what he thinks while not inciting violence and with few other restrictions. I’m glad he has that right and I have mine to write here and post my remarks. That is the crux of the First Amendment.
He is not being punished for using those rights. People are espousing that he is being persecuted for his (christian) beliefs, etc. Nope. You’re wrong and if you can’t see that then you qualify as an idiot in my opinion. He is being punished because the television show which he participates in thinks that this will cause a ruckus and may damage the brand and/or show. It might to a certain degree, but what it will really do is make the brand stronger than ever because while a few moderates will drop off as fans because of this kerfuffle even more (christian) people will dig in their heels and swear allegiance to the ‘poor man who is being persecuted for stating his beliefs’.
In reality A&E did the best thing possible to strengthen their brand and probably increase awareness (and profits). Judging by the fervor I am seeing via Facebook and Twitter their plan is working wonderfully. They are increasing ownership of current fans and pulling in the millions who consider this an attack on their religion instead of the brand protection/promotion that it is really.
So, he said what he wanted. A&E is protecting/promoting. No one is being punished for saying what they think. I saw someone compare him to Miley Cyrus being applauded for her recent weirdness and poor Phil being persecuted. No. Phil exercised his rights as did Miley. Miley arguably increased her brand as did Phil. The conservative groups speak ill of Miley and adore Phil. Two sides of the coin both increasing their coin.
If you cannot see these things, I pity you.