Category: Legislation

Letter to the Editor of the Register-News Regarding Illinois’ Smoking Ban

I am writing this primarily in response to the recent letter from Jerry Merritt regarding smoking and the upcoming ban by the communist state of Illinois.

To begin, Merritt does an excellent job of using imagery to paint smokers as horrible people akin to “factory boilers, pacifier users, and druggies”. Also, being dressed well and going out after church has nothing to do with the smoking law, but it is more good creative writing. Kudos for creative writing.

Now, to address a few incorrect points made in that letter:

Non-smokers have no “right” to be guaranteed a non-smoking environment. I checked, it was nowhere in the Illinois nor United States constitutions.

Everyone does have the choice not to go into a business that allows smoking. If the business loses enough money by allowing smoking (for example, the non-smokers), they will disallow it. Apparently that is not the case.

Children fall into the same position. They have their decisions made for them (in theory) by their responsible parents or guardians. I agree they shouldn’t be around smoking, but they are their parents responsibility. The parents shouldn’t put them in that situation.

Similarly, smokers have no “right” to smoke at any given location. I like some local restaurants that don’t allow smoking. I don’t whine and cry about it. When we’re done eating and chatting, I just go outside and have a smoke. No big deal.

However, there are some times where I want to munch and have a smoke like at a sports bar. Obviously the business understands that its patrons like to have a smoke (pipe, cigar, etc.) and allows it. Some others don’t allow smoking, and I wouldn’t go there on those occasions.

The bottom line is that there is no right to smoke or not smoke. Everyone has a choice to smoke or not smoke and the right to support any business either way the owner decides to run their business.

This law is simply another way for the government to intrude on our personal lives and business decisions. If the state would just declare communism, they could control things like they want in our private lives and we couldn’t stop them. Oh wait…

“Nope, no smoking in bars! And pretty soon, no drinking and no talking!” – Eddie Izzard

Rape a child? Time to die.

Just read an article on Yahoo News about Louisiana’s Supreme Court upholding the death penalty for a man convicted of raping an 8-year-old girl.

At issue, from what I understand, is not whether he did the crime, but whether he can be sentenced to death or not. In my opinion he should be dead. Go ahead and call me a murderer if you want.

These horrible crimes against children have no justification or defense.  “But he didn’t kill anyone…” He didn’t? Did he/she not remove any innocence that child had? Did he/she not destroy that child’s life?

How about the recidivism rate? These evil people do the same or worse crimes once they are released from prison. Rehabilitation has been shown to be a joke in repeated studies.

The only tiny glimmer of hope is for a poor trial where someone is convicted falsely. I know it can happen, and that is horrible. However, when there is concrete evidence and/or witnesses, this animal needs to die.

Just my two cents worth.

Is Ted Buck a controlling jackass?

Early reports have it that he received a set of petitions at the county board meeting tonight with over 1,100 signatures and he didn’t give a rip.

Now, Teddy has seemed a bit heavy-handed at times, but I passed it off as biased reporting or maybe me just disagreeing with his decisions. Also, it is beginning to appear that he “has it in” for the local sheriff and/or the department.

How can he (if early reports are correct, I wasn’t present) pass off the will of 1100 people? Is he so full of himself that he plans to commit political suicide and ignore those who elected him?

Some people had told me he is an ass, but I had been holding my tongue for the most part since I don’t know him personally. Depending on how much truth there is to the news from the county board meeting, this will make or break him in my mind.

Blagojevich and other politicians waste Illinois’ taxpayers money

The Quad-Cities Online news site printed an article about another wasteful spending of money by Illinois’ governor Blagojevich and company. He scraped money from any government service or department that hadn’t used up their budget yet in this frivolous defense.

This time around, he was blowing money to defend a law that was blatantly un-Constitutional. Similar legislation had been found to violate free speech in other states, but he would just not give up.

Not only did the initial case fail, but so did appeal.

What made this twit think that his law would be special and be allowed to stand? Perhaps it is the God-like mentality that he seems to emanate in everything he does in office. From trying to bring in drugs from other countries to trying to ban any form of weapon, the man is out to make the world in his image.

I pray we do not elect another twit like this in the coming gubernatorial election. Perhaps we can get someone fiscally responsible and less drunk with power.

Hate Crimes – Real or just hype?

I am torn on legislation recognizing “hate crimes“. There are crimes, and not crimes. How can you define “hate crimes”?

If someone gets into a fight at a bar with someone else, it is disturbing the peace, assault, and so forth. Now, if the person you got into the fight with was homosexual, not white, or any other niche, you have committed a “hate crime“.

That example shows to me that the idea of “hate crime” is stupid. Just because something happens that is a crime and the victim or other party is calling themselves homosexual or african-american, you can be charged with a felony under these laws and face much harsher penalties than if they were white. Isn’t that reverse-racism (or sexism)?

The other side of the coin is when your local KKK chapter destroys a home because there are non-white people living in the house. In this case, the idiots did commit a crime that was directed at people simply due to their race. Those idiot criminals should be locked down and penalized to the maximum extent of the law. However, are special laws needed for that? Shouldn’t we just increase the penalties for whatever crime they committed and allow the judiciary the ability to use their sense to apply sentences as they should be?

Like I said, I’m torn. Racists and hate-filled people need to be dealt with harshly, but do we really need special laws to accomplish that end?